"Soils with biochar additions are typically more fertile, produce more and better crops for a longer period of time."
From Cornell ChronicleOnline by Susan Lang (Dr. Lehmann) “shows how reproducing the Amazon's black soil could increase fertility
and reduce global warming."
If biochar is some sort of miracle soil amendment, why have I never even heard of it? Have you?
Originally, Terra Preto was made by pre-Columbian Indians in the Amazon River Basin. Most information points to a society that burned trees to make room for agriculture then added agricultural waste, human and animal waste, broken pots and refuse in a sort of an agricultural garbage dump.
As I understand it, biochar can reduce the need for fertilizers, reduce greenhouse gasses. “Char-amended soils have shown 50 - 80 percent reductions in nitrous oxide emissions, increase crop yield as well as supply a renewable energy source" (International Biochar Initiative [IBI]). According to IBI, “The bio-char process . . . produces a combination of both bio-energy and carbon-sequestering fertilizer from agricultural waste, which results in a net reduction of carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere.”
Today, biochar is manufactured by slow pyrolysis. According to Best Energies
http://www.bestenergies.com/ in their work on clean energy production:
“Slow pyrolysis is a thermochemical decomposition of organic material at elevated temperatures in the absence of oxygen. The feed material is dried and fed into a stirred, heated kiln. As the material passes through the kiln, a combustible synthesis gas (syngas) is evolved and is continuously removed from the kiln. Approximately 35% by weight of the dry feed material is converted to a high-carbon char material that is collected on the discharge of the kiln.”
An easier to understand article was published September 1, 2007
Environmental Science & Technology published by the American Chemical Society:
"Pyrolysis, a technologically advanced form of smoldering, involves burning biomass under controlled, low-oxygen conditions. Small- and large-scale facilities work in various ways and yield a variety of energy products, including bio-oils and gases, with biochar as a byproduct."
http://www.css.cornell.edu/faculty/lehmann/publ/Media/Renner%202007%20EST.pdfOK, let’s just say heating in the absence of air.

There is definite interest in biochar research and production worldwide. The International Biochar Initiative (IBI) was formed in 2006. In 2007, IBI held a conference in Australia. It attracted science & business professionals from around the world. The 2008 conference will be held September 8-10, 2008 in the UK.
http://www.biochar-international.org/Democratic Senator Ken Salazar of Colorado introduced S.1884 – The Salazar Harvesting Energy Act of 2007.
A Summary of Biochar Provisions in S.1884: Carbon-Negative Biomass Energy and Soil Quality Initiative for the 2007 Farm Bill is published here
http://www.biochar-international.org/newinformationevents/newlegislation.html The bill will boost funding for biochar research.
There are many unanswered questions:
Who will conduct research into the possible negative environmental effects?
Who will regulate or measure manufacturing methods and quality (how)?
Will modern biochar be able to reproduce the sustainability of benefits to the soil that was established in pre-Columbian soils?
What system is best to mass produce biochar?
Will biochar contain enough inorganic ions, such as phosphorus and nitrogen, essential to plant growth?
What is the best raw material to use? How will it be collected?
Who will develop distribution machinery for farmers to use to spread biochar on crop fields? Will it be affordable?
There is a lot of work to be done but I suspect we’ll be hearing more about biochar in the future.
.